Show more

No Strings Attached

Summary: A guy and girl try to keep their relationship strictly physical, but it's not long before they learn that they want something more.
Runtime: 1 h 48 min
MPAA: R

Language: English
Movie budget: $ 25,000,000
Domestic: $ 70,662,220
International: $ 78,565,857

Box office:

Budget:$25MDomestic:$70.7MInternational:$78.6MWorldwide:$149.2M

Box office International:

Source: Box Office Mojo

Possible Big Business:

Production:

Paramount Pictures

DreamWorks

Spyglass Entertainment

4%
47%51%

50/10055/100
50%17%
White44.44%Jewish38.89%Indian11.11%Black5.56%
0.91

LGBTQ content included:

homosexual, lesbian

BechdeltestPassed!

Commonsensemedia

Message1/5
Role model1/5
Violence1/5
Sex4/5
Language4/5
Consumerism2/5
Drugs3/5

Dove

Sex4/5
Language5/5
Violence1/5
Drugs4/5
Nudity3/5
Other2/5

Please help improve our site and

Wokeness

Add Comment
Write a Review
Submit Review Link
Edit Family Friendly Rating

Stars:

Supporting cast:

Other cast:

Production:

RaceWhiteJewishIndianBlackTotalVisualsInfo
Ethnic452112
This is the most reliable data source for accurate ethnic breakdowns of famous people. Often the information is crowdsourced by users and they cite all their sources (family trees, obituaries, census archives, etc.) on the bottom of the page. The only issue is converting their ambiguous and inconsistent verdicts into quantifiable variables.

Source: https://ethnicelebs.com/

Kairos33
A third party facial recognition software company we used to maintain objectivity. Upload images to the facial recognition demo page to check the veracity of our data set. Or use their API and do a bulk peer review if you'd like.

Source: https://www.kairos.com/demos

Jew11
Believe it or not, this website is actually ran by proud Jews who just poke fun at themselves. However, they celebrate Judaism and Ashkenazi DNA. Their verdicts are varied and have humorous opinions added, but we filter them into a quantifiable binary Jewish or not variable. Unlike Ethnicelebs, this data set uses religion when determining if a person is Jewish or not, even if they have zero Ashkenazi DNA.

Source: http://www.jewornotjew.com/

Crowd11
This is the crowdsourced dataset created by users like you! We greatly appreciate your cooperation in making ZR the most accurate and massive database on the internet. Sometimes the verdicts are submitted by looks alone, sometimes users attach an image and a source link. Due to this inconsistency please take the results with a grain of salt and click each actor for more info.
Forebears11
Total872118
Cast Percentages44.44%38.89%11.11%5.56%100%
U.S. Population (2010) Percentage63.7%1.71%0.92%12.6%
Source:
US Census
(Note: Racial and ethnic categories overlap so the sum will not equal 100%.)
U.S. Population (2010) Representation-19.26+37.18+10.19-7.04
U.S. Buying Power (2010) Percentage77.06%7.85%
U.S. Buying Power (2010) Representation-32.62-2.29
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Percentage71.15%9.47%
U.S. Average Individual Income (2018) Representation-26.71-3.91
World population (2011) Percentage15.05%0.34%21.82%13.04%
NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World population (2011) Representation+29.39+38.55-10.71-7.48
World Buying Power Percentage36.48%1.11%6.94%6.38%
NOTE: ZR is the first organization to ever create a global buying power divided by race. Essentially we just took data from CIA.gov FactBook, UN Population Estimates, and The World Bank's Population Estimates / Purchasing Power Parity Per Capita.
World Buying Power Representation+7.96+37.78+4.17-0.82
Notes
If there were any inconsistencies with percentages calculated using our Census data, the Jewish Data Bank percentages were the ones used. Also please review the Jewish Data Bank pdf to understand the difference between the "Core" Jewish population and the "Extended" / "Law of Return" Jewish populations. We are displaying the "Core" Jewish populations since that is what the Jewish Data Bank and Wikipedia articles chose.

Also, the 1942 population estimates were used for the 1940 row. For the 2000 estimates, the "Core" definition was not used, so we used the 5.2 mil broader estimate instead of the 4.3 mil estimate since the 5.2 broader estimate seemed too drastic of a drop and the definitions weren't congruent with Core and Law of Return.

aspiring writeraudiaudi a3audi a3audi motor vehicleautomobilebare buttbare chested malebedbirthday partybmwbmw 5 seriesbmw carbmw motor vehicleboyfriend girlfriend relationshipbrabritish sex comedycarcasual sexcolleague colleague relationshipcoworker coworker relationshipdancingdestroying a cellphonedinnerdoctordrug overdoseegocentric womanembarrassmentemotional blackmailex boyfriend ex girlfriend relationshipf wordfamily relationshipsfather son relationshipfemale doctorflatmate flatmate relationshipfriends with benefitsfriendship between mengerman cargiftglassesgolf ballgolf holegroup of friendshairy chesthigh school promimmature womanimpersonationin lawsirresponsible womanjealous womankisskissinglesbian subtextlove trianglemale and female protagonistsmale nuditymale objectificationmale rear nuditymanic pixie dream boymanipulative womanmedical examinationmedical studentmini golfmother daughter relationshipmotor vehiclenymphomaniacolder man younger woman relationshippassive aggressive behaviorpassive aggressive womanpublic humiliationpurple braraunchy comedyreference to albert einsteinreference to drew barrymorereference to lil waynereference to the warriorsreference to winnie the poohroommate roommate relationshipscoldingselfish womansex comedysex in a closetsex in carsex in hospitalsex in laundry roomsex in showersex montagesexinesssexual attractionsexual desiresexual relationshipsexual relationshipssister sister relationshipstaff physicianstethoscopesurprise birthday partythree word titletoweluniversity of michiganvalentine's daywestwood californiawestwood californiawhite coatwoman woman relationship

Similar Movies:

Other sources

Parental Guide: +add

This film gets a 0.91/5 family friendly score

MPAA CertificationNo MPAA rating found yet. Add Family Friendly Rating?

IMDb Rating

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1411238/parentalguide

last updated: 2024-10-26Update data

Commonsensemedia Rating

https://www.commonsensemedia.org/movie-reviews/no-strings-attached

last updated: 2024-10-26Update data

Message
1/5

Amid the frank sexual content, there's a romantic message: You can’t choose who you love, and you can’t control how to fall in love. There's also the suggestion that no matter how accomplished you are, life isn't complete without love.

Role model
1/5

The two main characters may be neurotic and full of bravado, but they’re also appealingly human. And though they might be confused about what a real relationship entails, they're kind and caring toward each other.

Violence
1/5

A young man punches an older man in the stomach.

Sex
4/5

The movie revolves around the idea of two friends hooking up purely for sexual gratification. They're shown in various states of undress -- him in nothing but a towel to cover his privates, her in underwear -- and in compromising positions. There are plenty of innuendos, and sex is discussed with much candor, including specific acts. Two women are shown making out.

Language
4/5

Language includes frequent use of "f--k," "s--t," "d--k," "c--k," "damn," "ass," "bitch," "crap," "oh my God," and more.

Consumerism
2/5

Brands that are name- or label-checked include BMW, Stella Artois, Jolly Rancher, 7-Up, Patron, and Prius.

Drugs
3/5

A father smokes a joint with his adult son. Later, the father has a bad reaction to a concoction whose main ingredient is cough syrup. A woman gets inebriated at a party; scenes of social drinking. Jokes about cocaine.

Dove Rating

https://dove.org/review/8682-no-strings-attached/
Faith
0/5

None

Sex
4/5

A lot of sex scenes showing the couple about to have sex, having sex and finishing the act; couples kissing passionately and making out; the mention of a condom; groans from a man and woman as they are having sex; a man's hand is seen on woman's rear; two women kiss; two men are seen as a man's two "dads", a homosexual couple.

Language
5/5

Strong language throughout including the F bomb being used a lot and in a sexual manner; biblical profanity and sexual slang and several mentions of the male organ.

Violence
1/5

A man punches his dad in the stomach and hits him again for taking up with his ex-girlfriend.

Drugs
4/5

A lot of drinking scenes including drinking beer and wine; a marijuana cigarette is rolled and smoked; talk of taking drugs and getting high; talk of mushrooms making one high; cigarette smoking in one scene.

Nudity
3/5

Rear male nudity; partial rear female nudity; man totally naked except for covering his private area with a towel; cleavage; shirtless men; a few women seen in bra and panties.

Other
2/5

The topic of death is briefly utilized in the film; a man's father goes out with his ex-girlfriends; a couple bases their entire relationship on sex.

Methodology
Other sources

Douban
Douban
rating: 6.6/10
Douban
Eiga
Eiga
rating: 3.4/5
Eiga
OFDb
OFDb
rating: 6/10
OFDb

🇨🇳 douban:

Submit your review:

* required
0
Note: Please wrap spoilers [spoiler] like this. [/spoiler]

0
0
0
0
0

Critic Reviews:

Total found: 23 Show in Search

Internet Zeitgest:

Comments: