THE HISTORY OF THE CIVIL WAR (Dziga-Vertov, USSR, 1921, 4)
Ken Burns shooda made this in my opinion. Though there’s obviously historical value in the footage, it’s only even really a movie in the most formal of senses. It’s more like a slide show or a power-point presentation in which the slides happen to be moving. It’s practically all explanatory/expository title card, followed by footage that wouldn’t otherwise stand on its own. Without sound, the speeches and (show) trials can’t build as drama.
In addition, the film just does a terrible job of explaining the ebb and flow of the historical events — you cannot watch THE HISTORY OF THE CIVIL WAR without already knowing the history of the (Russian) civil war. What was the Kronstadt rebellion all about? Why were the Czechoslovaks...Full review >>